Ten years ago a passenger waiting for a train on the East Rail Line had a good chance of seeing a lengthy freight train go speeding past, but over the intervening years the consists had shrunk to just a single wagon, and by June 2010 there were no freights at all. So why did they disappear?
Through freight services between Hong Kong and Mainland China commenced in the 1950s, when the Kowloon-Canton Railway was a single track line that only saw a dozen or so trains a day. The 1982 modernisation project transformed the line into what it is today – a busy passenger link between Kowloon and the new towns of the New Territories – but freight services still found a path between the modern EMUs.
The freight trains themselves were made of up of wagons provided by China Railways, but were hauled through Hong Kong by the KCR’s fleet of EMD powered diesel-electrics locomotives, which were of three different types.
With the railway still operated by the Kowloon-Canton Railway Corporation, freight traffic remained an side business to the much more intensive passenger services. Southbound traffic dominated, with trains carrying livestock, textiles, foodstuff, metal, timber, clothing, footwear and chemicals across the border from China. Traffic in the reverse direction was mostly loaded containers from the wharf at Hung Hom. The main freight destinations inside China were Guangdong, Sichuan, Hubei, Henan, Shanghai, and Hunan.
For passengers the most noticeable cargo on the line was the transport of pigs from farms in Mainland China to Hong Kong slaughterhouses, with the trains stinking out platforms as they rolled through on their way to the livestock depot at Hung Hom. Thankfully a new slaughterhouse opened near the border at Sheung Shui in 2000, putting an end to the horrible stench experienced by waiting passengers.
Other than pigs, the other major cargo was containers moving from the Port of Hong Kong to recipients throughout southern China. The peak year of operations was 1987, when the line carried 200,000 TEUs of containers. From then time on container traffic was in continued decline, due to competition from road transport, and the rapid development of new port facilities in Mainland China that usurped those in Hong Kong.
As well as competition from competing carriers and terminals, KCR freight trains were also threatened by the increasing number of passengers travelling by rail, as the two classes of train needed to share the double tracks of the East Rail Line. To address the conflict the KCR drew up plans for the “Port Rail Line”, which would link the border crossing at Lo Wu with Hong Kong’s main container terminal at Kwai Chung. Included in the 2000 ‘Second Railway Development Study’ and costed at HK$5 billion to HK$9 billion, two routes were considered:
- Lo Wu to Tai Wai via the existing East Rail, then a tunnel under the mountains to the Port of Hong Kong.
- New track from Lo Wu to Lok Ma Chau spur line, shared track with the new “Northern Link” to Kam Sheung Road Station, then shared tracks with West Rail.
The KCRC justified the new link as it would reduce the reliance on trucks moving containers in and out of the port, but the study found that the new line would only be viable if the level of cross-border freight was to grow.
This upwards trend in traffic never materialised, despite a few minor increases, such as those detailed in the 1999 KCRC Annual Report (page 1) (page 2):
Total revenue from freight forwarding stood at $24 million, an 85% increase from $13 million in 1998. Container traffic increased by 34% to 10,086 TEUs in 1999. Breakbulk traffic dropped 8% to 15,269 wagons and livestock wagons decreased 8% to 10,409 wagons.
Despite the 34% “growth” in container traffic, the total TEUs (20-foot containers) carried in 1999 was 1/20th of that carried back in the peak of 1987. Because of the slump, in 2000 the KCRC phased out their freight forwarding business to the mainland, citing competition from trucking companies. Over the next five years the freight volumes continued to slip, from 2.5 million tonnes in 1998 to 1.2 million tonnes in 2004.
This slump was despite the Hong Kong freight transport market experiencing average growth of 9.7% per annum between 1990 and 1999, and lead to the KCRC’s net profit from freight operations declining sharply:
The impact on train sizes can also be visualised from the KCRC’s annual reports, which listed the average number of wagons per train:
|Year||Average southbound wagons / day||Average northbound wagons / day|
Despite all of the doom and gloom, in the early 2000s it appears the Corporation still thought they had a place in the competitive cross-border freight market, when they spent HK$130 million for five new Siemens Eurorunner 2,000 kW locomotives (US$3.3 million each) which were delivered in 2003.
In an effort to arrest the decline in freight traffic, the Corporation announced in 2005 plans to re-enter the freight forwarding business that it has previously abandoned in 2000, managing the entire door-to-door transport of goods, instead of being a linehaul operator between rail terminals. Aiming to improve the level of service provided to their customers and capture a slice of the heavy cargo traffic in the Pearl River Delta, the KCRC was motived by a desire to diversify their revenue beyond passenger trains and real estate developments, in preparation for the upcoming merger of Hong Kong’s two rail operators: the KCRC and the MTR Corporation.
These moves ware not successful, and by 2008 rail freight accounted for only 0.08% of the total freight throughput between the Mainland and Hong Kong, with only 12,000 TEUs moved per year, or about 30 TEUs a day. Towards the end of freight operations the longest trains consisted of 10 to 20 wagons, with a mix of enclosed boxvans and open wagons loaded with containers. The only other traffic was bulk mail, which was conveyed from the International Mail Centre at Hung Hom in white and orange liveried baggage vans supplied by the China Railways.
The final nail in the coffin of Hong Kong rail freight was delivered in 29 October 2009, when the MTR (successor of the KCRC after the completion of the rail merger) announced that they would exit the freight business.
The MTR justified the decision as follows:
After careful study, the Corporation has decided to wind down its freight business over the next several months to better utilize train paths currently being used for the freight business to provide greater flexibility for passenger train service, benefiting the people of Hong Kong.
Just as predicted by the KCR back in 1999 during their planning for the Port Rail Line. The last KCR freight train ran on June 15, 2010 with locomotive KCR 58 leading 13 wagons.
The 60 staff in the MTR Freight business were moved into other roles, but as of 2010 the freight yards remain disused.
- Youtube videos by user ‘KCR58’: all of the above videos of KCR freight trains are by him
I find it a massive shame considering that a good rail freight link could take many trucks off the roads. Even here in the UK, where railways aren’t exactly booming, the rail freight industry here has been going steadily along and the use of railways help take some traffic off our congested roads.
It’s disappointing to see the freight trains end, but overall the rail from Hung Hom hardly took any trucks off the road. Rail competes well with bulk movements of goods, the pig traffic is one of those, as was the containers out of Hung Hom.
For the cargo crossing the border, today it can just be unloaded at one of the new container ports that have been built in mainland China over the past decade.
As for traffic inside Hong Kong, the freight terminals along East Rail were very small, and the industrial districts are scattered all over the territory, so trucks were still needed to take cargo the “last mile” anyway.
I was working in HK on the signaling upgrade for KCRC in the late 1990s. What you said about the pig trains and their stench is so true, it lingered particularly long in the tunnels. I also remember being on the passenger platforms when the new “time to next train” signs would say “Next train not stopping” and everyone would get as far from the platform edge as possible, and the relief they would express when that train turned out to be something else.
One of my local railfan friends warned me of the pig trains when I told him about my Hong Kong trip- I hate to think how long the stink lingers in the tunnels!
Pingback: Rail freight yards in Hong Kong - Checkerboard Hill
Pingback: Abandoned Railway Lines, Stations and Tunnels in Hong Kong…and more » The Industrial History of Hong Kong Group
Even the pigs and cattle destined for the slaughterhouse in Sheung Shui are now transported by trucks from the Mainland, partly due to the decline in the volume of live pigs and cows.
Thanks for the update.
I remember as a kid in Hong Kong in the late 1980s I have seen tank cars running on the KCR line at night. Can someone please confirm that with me. It would be a night time train and I remember seeing it as a south bound train on Tai Wai station heading in the Hung Hum direction.
Back in 1978 there were 20 freight trains a day, with 143,166 tonnes of oil and diesel was imported to Hong Kong by rail.
This book suggests Tai Po Kau railway station was once responsible for oil wagons from the Daqing Oilfield in China.
With Chinese Wikipedia suggesting the trains went to Fo Tan freight yard in later years:
Pingback: RAIL FREIGHT RETURNS TO HONG KONG WITH DAILY 50-TONNE PANDEMIC WAGON – TRANSIT 🇭🇰 JAM
The 5th Wave of COVID led to freight trains making a return on Hong Kong Rails
I saw that the freight was led by an orange DF4B. These locos were commonly seen in the late eighties up to the early 2000s hauling the cross-border through trains from HK to Guangzhou. They were later replaced by the DF11 and then the SS8. So nice to see them in HK again but from my understanding Lo Wu is as far as it goes
The Fo Tan freight yard would have been ideal but it’s currently being used to receive, assemble and store the R stock EMUs, maybe if this becomes a permanent fixture in the HK railway network Fo Tan could be used for Containers and Hung Hom’s soon to be abandoned platforms for bulk freight.
I guess the downside of using the platforms at Hung Hom is access – you couldn’t load containers onto trains in such a height confined space, and you’d need to create road access from the service road along the west side of the station.
Hi, sorry for late reply,but do you know that recently rail freight returned to Hong Kong temporarily in order to transport pandemic materials?
I found out thanks to the people who commented above. 😉
I don’t think freight trains will return on the East Rail Line given how busy the passenger service is nowadays. Freight trains will interfere with its operation.
Once they’re gone I can’t really see them coming back – but I wonder if the Through Trains were bumped onto the Express Rail Link then freight could take over those train paths. Alternatively, they could run freight trains overnight, or in off-peak times.
Since most goods are transported by cross border trucks now I can’t see a place for freight trains in HK. I don’t think running freight trains overnight will be an option because more track usage equals more maintenance and plus most of the freight yards are gone especially the Hung Hum freight yard.
Well there is no such thing as off peak hours in MTR. In fact MTR is planning to increase the frequency of passenger EMUS from every 3 to 2 minutes because MTR is anticipating more users with the opening of the East Rail cross harbour section in June and with the new R trains having only 9 coaches as opposed to the traditional 12, there is a need to run more trains.
Pingback: Looking back at Hong Kong's pig trains - Checkerboard Hill
Pingback: The return of cross-boundary freight trains to Hong Kong - Checkerboard Hill